112%
Avg enterprise attainment (top performers)
67%
Of reps typically hitting quota
4
Common attainment measurement types
Quota Attainment Dashboard
Plan Language
Revenue Attainment
Each Participant's Quota Attainment shall be calculated as the quotient of (a) Recognized Revenue credited to the Participant during the Measurement Period divided by (b) the Participant's assigned Revenue Quota for the same Measurement Period, expressed as a percentage and rounded to two decimal places. Recognized Revenue means revenue that has been booked, invoiced, and accepted in accordance with the Company's Revenue Recognition Policy as then in effect. Revenue attributable to orders cancelled or reversed prior to the close of the Measurement Period shall be excluded from the numerator. Quota adjustments approved by Sales Operations prior to the final day of the Measurement Period shall be reflected in the denominator.
Unit Attainment
Participants assigned a Unit Quota shall have their attainment measured as the number of Qualifying Units credited during the Measurement Period divided by the Unit Quota, expressed as a percentage. A Qualifying Unit is defined as a fully executed order for a product listed on the Eligible Unit Product Schedule, with a minimum contract value of $[THRESHOLD] and a contract term of not less than twelve (12) months. Multi-year contracts shall be credited as a single unit at the time of booking regardless of the number of renewal years. Unit Attainment shall be calculated independently of Revenue Attainment and shall not be converted to a revenue equivalent for purposes of accelerator eligibility.
Multi-Measure Weighted Attainment
For Participants subject to a Multi-Measure Compensation Plan, overall Quota Attainment shall be a weighted composite of two or more discrete performance measures as specified in the Participant's Plan Schedule. Each component measure shall be calculated independently as Actual Result divided by Component Quota, expressed as a percentage and capped at [CAP]% prior to weighting. Weighted Attainment shall equal the sum of each Component Attainment multiplied by its assigned weight as set forth in the Plan Schedule, provided that the sum of all component weights equals 100%. Component weights may not be applied retroactively and shall remain fixed for the duration of the Measurement Period absent written approval from the VP of Sales Operations.
Formulas & Calculations
Basic Attainment Calculation
// Standard quota attainment formula ATTAINMENT = (ACTUAL_REVENUE / QUOTA) * 100 // Examples // Rep A: $560,000 revenue / $500,000 quota = 112% // Rep B: $380,000 revenue / $500,000 quota = 76% // Rep C: $500,000 revenue / $500,000 quota = 100% // With revenue recognition timing adjustment CREDITED_REVENUE = BOOKED_REVENUE - CANCELLED_ORDERS - RETURNED_REVENUE ATTAINMENT = (CREDITED_REVENUE / QUOTA) * 100
Weighted Multi-Measure Attainment
// Multi-measure composite: each component capped before weighting REV_ATTAINMENT = MIN(ACTUAL_REVENUE / REVENUE_QUOTA, 1.50) * 100 UNIT_ATTAINMENT = MIN(ACTUAL_UNITS / UNIT_QUOTA, 1.50) * 100 REV_WEIGHT = 0.70 // 70% UNIT_WEIGHT = 0.30 // 30% WEIGHTED_ATTAINMENT = (REV_ATTAINMENT * REV_WEIGHT) + (UNIT_ATTAINMENT * UNIT_WEIGHT) // Example: // Rev: $560K / $500K = 112% → capped 112% × 0.70 = 78.4 // Units: 8 / 10 = 80% → capped 80% × 0.30 = 24.0 // WEIGHTED_ATTAINMENT = 78.4 + 24.0 = 102.4%
Scenarios
Clear Attainment Thresholds Drive Focused Behavior
A regional SaaS sales org publishes a single-page attainment reference card: below 80% = no variable pay; 80–99% = ramped commission; 100%+ = full rate plus accelerators. Reps understand exactly what each deal closes means for their paycheck. A mid-quarter pipeline review shows 12 of 18 reps within $40K of the 100% threshold — sales managers prioritize acceleration coaching for those reps. End-of-quarter attainment distribution: 72% of reps above quota, average attainment 107%. Finance reports cost-of-sales within 1.4% of plan.
Sandbagged Quotas Inflate Attainment and Destroy Trust
An enterprise software company allows field managers to negotiate quota with reps at the start of the year. Senior reps with strong relationships set quotas 20–30% below their historical averages. Year-end attainment data shows 94% of reps hitting quota — leadership celebrates the number until finance benchmarks it against market data. Externally, the same reps are at 73rd percentile of attainment versus peers. Accelerators pay out $2.1M above plan because thresholds are reached too easily. The following year, finance resets quotas sharply upward — morale collapses, and three senior AEs resign in Q1.
Comparison
Implementation Checklist
AI Prompt Template
Copy & paste into your AI assistant
You are a sales compensation analyst reviewing attainment distribution data for a sales organization. I have [NUMBER] reps with the following attainment profile: - Average attainment: [AVERAGE]% - Percent hitting quota: [PCT_AT_QUOTA]% - Standard deviation: [STD_DEV] percentage points - Top quartile average: [TOP_QUARTILE]% - Bottom quartile average: [BOTTOM_QUARTILE]% Please: 1. Diagnose whether this distribution suggests quota setting problems, a performance distribution problem, or both 2. Identify whether the attainment data suggests top-performer retention risk 3. Recommend 2–3 adjustments to either quota-setting methodology or plan design that could improve the distribution 4. Flag any attainment patterns that suggest gaming or sandbagging 5. Provide a draft attainment health scorecard framework I can run quarterly